We had a very interesting spiritual development team meeting this morning. Yesterday I got an email asking us to prepare to answer the question, “If you could plant a church, where would it be and what would it look like?”
That really pushed a button in me. I’ve been very interested in the idea of church-planting or being involved in a church plant. It’s happening all around Austin. There are 2 or 3 churches that have plants all over the Austin metro area. These churches are also growing exponentially. I do think there’s a correlation there, but I digress.
So, I sat down at my trusty Macbook and jotted/typed a few thoughts down about what my church would look like.
First, without a doubt, my church would be in Manhattan. More specifically, the East Village. The East Village is a trendy, artsy, funky, urban, postmodern mecca. I love to imagine what a church that grew up out of this cultural soil would look like.
Here are my thoughts (as they were put on paper). They may not make sense to anyone but me, but you’ll get the basic idea.
1. Holistic: Including both relational evangelism and social action.
- does not divide evangelism and social action.
- body grows through relationships.
2. Central concern is to incarnate the Gospel (missional) into the community through relationships and partnerships.
- Reaching out: how can we help?
3. Limited large group meetings:
- focus would be on community and community “settings” and “environments”
- 100% organic: location/culture determines methods
4. Artistically inclined:
- use of every form of media: drama, music, painting, sculpting, etc.
- possibly a coffee shop, art gallery, bookstore, recording studio, concert venue, etc.
- a place where community can unfold in an authentic way.
5. Postmodern in approach:
- see your target audience through the lens of postmodernity.
- target a postmodern audience while giving opportunities to all.
What is a postmodern approach?
Attempts to answer these questions biblically (from Scot McKnight):
1. Linguistically: that truth is dependent on the language we use to describe truth; therefore, the language is never the complete grasp of the truth.
2. Hermeneutically: everything we see and make sense of is “interpretation,” and our interpretations are never certain.
3. Paradigm: we realize that the primary grids we use to interpret reality (science, for instance) involve prior commitment to them in order for them to work. If you don’t believe in science, the scientific explanation doesn’t work.
In summary: Postmodernity then teaches that you and I, to one degree or another, are trapped in the human condition of language, interpretation, and prior commitments. This means we can never attain perfect objectivity. Some see postmodernity as a blessing for the Christian faith because it unmasks the reality of prior commitments; other worry that it erodes confidence in the truth of the gospel or the Bible.
